Add second PLT article
This commit is contained in:
Christine Dodrill
parent
9543e63049
commit
58c7011783
|
|
@ -0,0 +1,200 @@
|
|||
The Saga of plt, Part 2
|
||||
=======================
|
||||
|
||||
So I ended with a strong line of wisdom from `plt` last time. What if the
|
||||
authors that wrote free PGP did not release their source code? A nice rehash of
|
||||
the [Clipper Chip](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Clipper_chip) anyone?
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
2015-01-25
|
||||
[00:06:15] <Xe> but they did release their code
|
||||
[00:06:40] <plt> I saw a few that did not release their source code.
|
||||
[00:07:09] <plt> Its up to the author if they want to release it under the U.S Copyright Laws.
|
||||
[00:08:50] <plt> http://copyright.gov/title17/circ92.pdf
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
Note that this is one of the few external links `plt` will give that actually
|
||||
works. A lot of this belief in copyright and the like seems to further some
|
||||
kind of delusional system involving everyone being out to steal his code and
|
||||
profit off of it.
|
||||
|
||||
Please don't pay this person.
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
[00:57:18] <plt> The ircd follows the Internet Relay Protocols
|
||||
[00:57:35] <Xe> which RFC's?
|
||||
[00:57:43] <plt> Yep
|
||||
[00:58:01] <plt> Accept for the IRCD Link works a little bit different.
|
||||
[00:58:57] <plt> Version 2.0 or 3.0 will include it's own IRC Services that will work with PBIRCD.
|
||||
[01:01:53] <plt> Later version will include open proxy daemon
|
||||
[01:02:34] <plt> Version 1.00 will allow the ircd owner to define the irc command security levels which is a lot different from the other ircds.
|
||||
[01:04:27] <plt> Xe that is the file /Conf/cmdlevs.conf.& the /Conf/userlevs.conf
|
||||
[01:05:24] <plt> Adding a option for spam filtering may be included in the future version of PBIRCD.
|
||||
[01:07:03] <plt> Xe PBIRCD will have not functions added to allow the operators to spy on the users.
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
Oh lord. Something you might notice quickly is that `plt` has no internal
|
||||
filter nor ability to keep to one topic for very long. And that also `plt` has
|
||||
some strange belief that folder names Should Start With Capital Letters, and
|
||||
that apparently all configuration should be:
|
||||
|
||||
- split into multiple files
|
||||
- put into the root of the drive
|
||||
|
||||
Also note that last line. Note it in bold.
|
||||
|
||||
Some time passed with no activity in the channel.
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
[18:50:49] <plt> Hey Xe
|
||||
[18:51:06] <Xe> hi
|
||||
[18:58:54] <plt> How did you like the information that I showed you yesterday?
|
||||
[19:02:56] <Xe> it's useless to me
|
||||
[19:03:03] <Xe> I don't run on a standard linux setup
|
||||
[19:03:15] <Xe> I need source code to evaluate things
|
||||
[19:03:17] <Xe> :P
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
When I am running unknown code, I use a virtual machine running [Alpine
|
||||
Linux](http://alpinelinux.org). I literally do need the source code to be able
|
||||
to run binaries as Alpine doesn't use glibc.
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
[19:04:24] <plt> It's the standard irc commands and I am still working on
|
||||
adding some more features.
|
||||
[19:04:38] <Xe> what language is it in?
|
||||
[19:04:48] <Xe> how does it handle an accept() flood?
|
||||
[19:09:17] <plt> Are you refering to accept() flood while connecting to the ircd or a channel?
|
||||
[19:20:42] <plt> You can not compare some of the computer languages with C since some of they run at the same speed as C. Maybe some of them where a lot slower but in some cases that is not the same today!
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
These are some very simple questions I ask when evaluating a language or tool
|
||||
for use in a project like an IRC server. How does it handle when people are
|
||||
punishing it? So the obvious answer is to answer that some languages are
|
||||
comparable to C in terms of execution speed!
|
||||
|
||||
How did I not see that before?
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
[19:26:05] <Xe> what language is it?
|
||||
[19:27:23] <plt> Purebasic [...]
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
I took a look at the site for [PureBasic](http://www.purebasic.com). It looks
|
||||
like Visual Basic's proprietary cousin as written by someone who hates
|
||||
programmers. Looking at its feature set:
|
||||
|
||||
- Huge set of internal commands (1400+) to quickly and easily build any
|
||||
application or game
|
||||
- All BASIC keywords are supported
|
||||
- Very fast compiler which creates highly optimized executables
|
||||
- No external DLLs, runtime interpreter or anything else required when creating
|
||||
executables
|
||||
- Procedure support for structured programming with local and global variables
|
||||
- Access to full OS API for advanced programmers
|
||||
- Advanced features such as pointers, structures, procedures, dynamically
|
||||
linked lists and much more
|
||||
|
||||
If you try to do everything, you will end up doing none of it. So it looks like
|
||||
PureBasic is supposed to be a compiler for people who can't learn Go, Ruby,
|
||||
Python, C, or Java. This looks promising.
|
||||
|
||||
I'm just going to paste the code for the 99 bottles of beer example. It
|
||||
requires OOP. I got this from [Rosetta Code](http://rosettacode.org/wiki/99_Bottles_of_Beer/Basic#PureBasic).
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
Prototype Wall_Action(*Self, Number.i)
|
||||
|
||||
Structure WallClass
|
||||
Inventory.i
|
||||
AddBottle.Wall_Action
|
||||
DrinkAndSing.Wall_Action
|
||||
EndStructure
|
||||
|
||||
Procedure.s _B(n, Short=#False)
|
||||
Select n
|
||||
Case 0 : result$="No more bottles "
|
||||
Case 1 : result$=Str(n)+" bottle of beer"
|
||||
Default: result$=Str(n)+" bottles of beer"
|
||||
EndSelect
|
||||
If Not Short: result$+" on the wall": EndIf
|
||||
ProcedureReturn result$+#CRLF$
|
||||
EndProcedure
|
||||
|
||||
Procedure PrintBottles(*Self.WallClass, n)
|
||||
Bottles$=" bottles of beer "
|
||||
Bottle$ =" bottle of beer "
|
||||
txt$ = _B(*Self\Inventory)
|
||||
txt$ + _B(*Self\Inventory, #True)
|
||||
txt$ + "Take one down, pass it around"+#CRLF$
|
||||
*Self\AddBottle(*Self, -1)
|
||||
txt$ + _B(*self\Inventory)
|
||||
PrintN(txt$)
|
||||
ProcedureReturn *Self\Inventory
|
||||
EndProcedure
|
||||
|
||||
Procedure AddBottle(*Self.WallClass, n)
|
||||
i=*Self\Inventory+n
|
||||
If i>=0
|
||||
*Self\Inventory=i
|
||||
EndIf
|
||||
EndProcedure
|
||||
|
||||
Procedure InitClass()
|
||||
*class.WallClass=AllocateMemory(SizeOf(WallClass))
|
||||
If *class
|
||||
InitializeStructure(*class, WallClass)
|
||||
With *class
|
||||
\AddBottle =@AddBottle()
|
||||
\DrinkAndSing =@PrintBottles()
|
||||
EndWith
|
||||
EndIf
|
||||
ProcedureReturn *class
|
||||
EndProcedure
|
||||
|
||||
If OpenConsole()
|
||||
*MyWall.WallClass=InitClass()
|
||||
If *MyWall
|
||||
*MyWall\AddBottle(*MyWall, 99)
|
||||
While *MyWall\DrinkAndSing(*MyWall, #True): Wend
|
||||
;
|
||||
PrintN(#CRLF$+#CRLF$+"Press ENTER to exit"):Input()
|
||||
CloseConsole()
|
||||
EndIf
|
||||
EndIf
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
We are dealing with a professional language here folks. Their evaluation
|
||||
version of the compiler didn't let me compile binaries and I'm not going to pay
|
||||
$120 for a copy of it.
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
[19:27:23] <plt> Purebasic it does not make one bit of difference since it runs at the same speed as c
|
||||
[19:27:44] <plt> The compiler was writting in asm.
|
||||
[19:28:02] <Xe> pfffft
|
||||
[19:28:04] <Xe> lol
|
||||
[19:28:20] <Xe> I thought you would at least have used VB6
|
||||
[19:28:37] <plt> VB6 is so old dude.
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
At least there is some sense there.
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
[19:28:44] <Xe> so is purebasic
|
||||
[19:28:54] <plt> You can not compare purebasic with the other basic compilers.
|
||||
[19:29:51] <Xe> yes I can
|
||||
[19:29:56] <Xe> seeing as you post no code
|
||||
[19:29:59] <Xe> I can and I will
|
||||
[19:30:16] <plt> Makes no logic what you said.
|
||||
[19:30:24] <Xe> I'm saying prove it
|
||||
[19:31:18] <plt> I am not going to give out the source code because of the encryption and no one has any reason to use it to decrypt the other irc networks passwords or traffic.
|
||||
[19:31:40] <Xe> so you've intentionally backdoored it to allow you to have access?
|
||||
[19:32:00] <plt> I dn not trust anyone any more.
|
||||
[19:32:29] <plt> Not after the nsa crap going on.
|
||||
[19:32:50] <Xe> so, in order to prove you don't trust anyone
|
||||
[19:33:06] <Xe> you've intentionally backdoored the communications server you've created and intend to sell to people?
|
||||
[19:33:37] <Xe> also
|
||||
[19:33:45] <Xe> purebasic is semantically similar to vb
|
||||
[19:34:06] <plt> There is no backdoors included in the source code. A course if a user gets a virus or hacked that is not going to be my fault.
|
||||
```
|
||||
Loading…
Reference in New Issue