time-wasting-thread-memorial/raw/pages/160.json

{"topics":[{"id":"535200f96368720a19220100","topic_id":"5161dd617f123bd25900013d","body":"\"@SeraphimDawn\":/dis/the-time-wasting-thread/post/5352007f6368723971760000#post_5352007f6368723971760000\r\nDarn right anti-censorship! I would follow the precedent set by the state of Oregon and declare obscenity laws unconstitutional, no longer would you have to guess if porn is legal or not.","author":"5010fa077f123b1e4f00104e"},{"id":"5352017463687275cb970100","topic_id":"5161dd617f123bd25900013d","body":"\"@twistedmetalero\":/dis/the-time-wasting-thread/post/535200d16368725ef6010000#post_535200d16368725ef6010000\r\nVery true but keep in mind the President has the right to veto bills sent to his desk and they can only override the veto with a 2/3 majority vote from both the House and Senate.","author":"5010fa077f123b1e4f00104e"},{"id":"535201ad6368723971c20000","topic_id":"5161dd617f123bd25900013d","body":"\"@gasmaskangel\":/dis/the-time-wasting-thread/post/535200ef63687253e8080000#post_535200ef63687253e8080000\r\nI have never fucked anything other than my hand, unless you count the time where I tried to use the slit in a Bull _T. rex_ toy's belly.","author":"50b70eeb7f123b1a02000097"},{"id":"535202156368723971dd0000","topic_id":"5161dd617f123bd25900013d","body":"\"@someguy111\":/dis/the-time-wasting-thread/post/535200f96368720a19220100#post_535200f96368720a19220100\r\nBut we still got to protect the vulnerable. IE Real Children, women, etc.\r\n\r\nWe don't want anyone forced into doing something against their will. Non-fictional CP will remain illegal.","author":"4fde5cee945b700a970060fc"},{"id":"5352026263687202360c0000","topic_id":"5161dd617f123bd25900013d","body":"\"@SeraphimDawn\":/dis/the-time-wasting-thread/post/535202156368723971dd0000#post_535202156368723971dd0000\r\nWell of course. That's just common sense.","author":"5010fa077f123b1e4f00104e"},{"id":"535203d263687253e8020100","topic_id":"5161dd617f123bd25900013d","body":"On the topic of censorship, this quote from a federal judge reminds me that there are some good people in government:\r\n\r\n\"The idea that the First Amendment permits government to ban publications that are 'offensive' to some people puts an ominous gloss on freedom of the press. That test would make it possible to ban any paper or any journal or magazine in some benighted place. The First Amendment was designed 'to invite dispute,' to induce 'a condition of unrest,' to 'create dissatisfaction with conditions as they are,' and even to stir 'people to anger.' The idea that the First Amendment permits punishment for ideas that are 'offensive' to the particular judge or jury sitting in judgment is astounding. No greater leveler of speech or literature has ever been designed. To give the power to the censor, as we do today, is to make a sharp and radical break with the traditions of a free society. The First Amendment was not fashioned as a vehicle for dispensing tranquilizers to the people. Its prime function was to keep debate open to 'offensive' as well as to 'staid' people. The tendency throughout history has been to subdue the individual and to exalt the power of government. The use of the standard 'offensive' gives authority to government that cuts the very vitals out of the First Amendment. As is intimated by the Court's opinion, the materials before us may be garbage. But so is much of what is said in political campaigns, in the daily press, on TV, or over the radio. By reason of the First Amendment—and solely because of it—speakers and publishers have not been threatened or subdued because their thoughts and ideas may be 'offensive' to some.\"","author":"5010fa077f123b1e4f00104e"},{"id":"535204786368723266110000","topic_id":"5161dd617f123bd25900013d","body":"So was Raiden's kid ever shown?","author":"4fde4618945b700aa0002fff"},{"id":"535204dc6368720236ad0000","topic_id":"5161dd617f123bd25900013d","body":"I have been wanting to collect some more _Jurassic Park_ toys. I only get certain amounts of money at certain times though, so I might only get to buy one major toy this year. So I am no