From 2432b5a4fc6bc068b5d5b8841deedcfd2e9f5dd5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Xe Date: Sun, 15 May 2022 11:47:55 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] shill fly.io Signed-off-by: Xe --- blog/fly.io-heroku-replacement.markdown | 108 ++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 108 insertions(+) create mode 100644 blog/fly.io-heroku-replacement.markdown diff --git a/blog/fly.io-heroku-replacement.markdown b/blog/fly.io-heroku-replacement.markdown new file mode 100644 index 0000000..eba9208 --- /dev/null +++ b/blog/fly.io-heroku-replacement.markdown @@ -0,0 +1,108 @@ +--- +title: "Fly.io: the Reclaimer of Heroku's Magic" +date: 2022-05-15 +tags: + - flyio + - heroku +vod: + twitch: https://www.twitch.tv/videos/1484123245 + youtube: https://youtu.be/BAgzkKpLVt4 +--- + +Heroku was catalytic to my career. It's been hard to watch the fall from grace. +Don't get me wrong, Heroku still _works_, but it's obviously been in maintenance +mode for years. When I worked there, there was a goal that just kind of grew in +scope over and over without reaching an end state: the Dogwood stack. + +In Heroku each "stack" is the substrate the dynos run on. It encompasses the AWS +runtime, the HTTP router, the logging pipeline and a bunch of the other +infrastructure like the slug builder and the deployment infrastructure. The +three stacks Heroku has used are named after trees: Aspen, Bamboo and Cedar. +Every Heroku app today runs on the Cedar stack, and compared to Bamboo it was a +generational leap in capability. Cedar was what introduced buildpacks and +support for any language under the sun. Prior stacks railroaded you into Ruby on +Rails (Heroku used to be a web IDE for making Rails apps). However there were +always plans to improve with another generational leap. This ended up being +called the "Dogwood stack", but Dogwood never totally materialized because it +was too ambitious for Heroku to handle post-acquisition. Parts of Dogwood's +roadmap ended up being used in the implementation of Private Spaces, but as a +whole I don't expect Dogwood to materialize in Heroku in the way we all had +hoped. + +However, I can confidently say that [fly.io](https://fly.io) seems like a viable +inheritor of the mantle of responsibility that Heroku has left into the hands of +the cloud. fly.io is a Platform-as-a-Service that hosts your applications on top +of physical dedicated servers run all over the world instead of being a reseller +of AWS. This allows them to get your app running in multiple regions for a lot +less than it would cost to run it on Heroku. They also use anycasting to allow +your app to use the same IP address globally. The internet itself will load +balance users to the nearest instance using BGP as the load balancing +substrate. + +People have been asking me what I would +suggest using instead of Heroku. I have been unable to give a good option until +now. If you are dissatisfied with the neglect of Heroku in the wake of the +Salesforce acquisition, take a look at fly.io. Its free tier is super generous. +I worked at Heroku and I am beyond satisfied with it. I'm considering using it +for hosting some personal services that don't need something like +NixOS. + +Applications can be built either using [cloud native +buildpacks](https://fly.io/docs/reference/builders/), Dockerfiles or arbitrary +docker images that you generated with something like Nix's +`pkgs.dockerTools.buildLayeredImage`. This gives you freedom to do whatever you +want like the Cedar stack, but at a fraction of the cost. Its default instance +size is likely good enough to run the blog you are reading right now and would +be able to do that for $2 a month plus bandwidth costs (I'd probably estimate +that to be about $3-5, depending on how many times I get on the front page of +Hacker News). + +You can have persistent storage in the form of volumes, poke the internal DNS +server fly.io uses for service discovery, run apps that use arbitrary TCP/UDP +ports (even a DNS server!), connect to your internal network over WireGuard, ssh +into your containers, and import Heroku apps into fly.io without having to +rebuild them. This is what the Dogwood stack should have been. This represents a +generational leap in the capabilities of what a Platform as a Service can do. + +Even more critical is that every app gets its own static IP address that you can +use for IP based firewall rules. This is something that was straight up +impossible in Heroku due to Heroku being a reseller of AWS, but since fly.io +owns their own infreastructure and IP space, they can do this with ease. Your +applications can be reached on a predictable IP and they will have outgoing +connections with the same IP. + +This is amazingly useful when dealing with +well-intentioned but outmoded security teams at companies you are integrating +with that insist that you absolutely must have a static IP for a service. No +more having to make ad-hoc SSH proxies or use some shady HTTP proxy as a +service. You just make connections and they just work. + +The stream VOD in the footer of this post contains my first impressions using +fly.io to try and deploy an app written with [Deno](https://deno.land) to the +cloud. I ended up creating a terrible CRUD app on stream using SQLite that +worked perfectly beyond expectations. I was able to _restart the app_ and my +SQLite database didn't get blown away. I could easily imagine myself combining +something like [litestream](https://litestream.io) into my docker images to +automate offsite backups of SQLite databases like this. It was magical. + +If you've never really used Heroku, for +context each dyno has a mutable filesystem. However that filesystem gets blown +away every time a dyno reboots. Having something that is mutable and persistent +is mind-blowing. + +Everything else you expect out of Heroku works like you'd expect in fly.io. The +only things I can see missing are automated Redis hosting by the platform +(however this seems intentional as fly.io is generic enough [to just run redis +directly for you](https://fly.io/docs/reference/redis/)) and the marketplace. +The marketplace being absent is super reasonable, seeing as Heroku's marketplace +only really started existing as a result of them being the main game in town +with all the mindshare. fly.io is a voice among a chorus, so it's understandable +that it wouldn't have the same treatment. + +Overall, I would rate fly.io as a worthy inheritor of Heroku's mantle as the +platform as a service that is just _magic_. It Just Works™️. There was no +fighting it at a platform level, it just worked. Give it a try. + +Don't worry +[@tqbf](https://twitter.com/tqbf), fly.io put in a good showing. I still wanna +meet you at some conference.