From 2dd22aca5e86fa4f92c65f780792f87b48800913 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Christine Dodrill Date: Sun, 7 Apr 2019 15:30:53 -0700 Subject: [PATCH] Chroma, you are magic --- blog/site-to-site-wireguard-part-1-2019-04-02.markdown | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/blog/site-to-site-wireguard-part-1-2019-04-02.markdown b/blog/site-to-site-wireguard-part-1-2019-04-02.markdown index 2169e8c..3df64fd 100644 --- a/blog/site-to-site-wireguard-part-1-2019-04-02.markdown +++ b/blog/site-to-site-wireguard-part-1-2019-04-02.markdown @@ -63,7 +63,7 @@ Generally people will pick routes out of the lower /12 of `10.0.0.0/8`. This exa - 10.55.1.3/32: MacBook (om) ``` -Depending on free network space, it may be preferable to split the first /24 block up into two logical /25 blocks (10.55.0.0/25 and 10.55.128.0/25). This is all a matter of taste and has no functional impact on the network. I'd suggest using consistent conventions in your subnetting whenever possible. +Depending on free network space, it may be preferable to split the first /24 block up into two logical /25 blocks (10.55.0.0/25 and 10.55.0.128/25). This is all a matter of taste and has no functional impact on the network. I'd suggest using consistent conventions in your subnetting whenever possible. ### WireGuard Port Allocation