forked from cadey/xesite
blog: add philosophical post about social media (#310)
Signed-off-by: Christine Dodrill <me@christine.website>
This commit is contained in:
GitHub
parent
990cce7267
commit
654d8915e7
|
|
@ -1785,7 +1785,6 @@ dependencies = [
|
|||
"percent-encoding",
|
||||
"pin-project-lite 0.2.3",
|
||||
"serde",
|
||||
"serde_json",
|
||||
"serde_urlencoded",
|
||||
"tokio 0.2.24",
|
||||
"tokio-tls",
|
||||
|
|
@ -2805,7 +2804,6 @@ dependencies = [
|
|||
"pretty_env_logger",
|
||||
"prometheus",
|
||||
"rand 0.8.2",
|
||||
"reqwest 0.10.10",
|
||||
"reqwest 0.11.0",
|
||||
"ructe",
|
||||
"sdnotify",
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -0,0 +1,273 @@
|
|||
---
|
||||
title: "Was Social Media a Mistake?"
|
||||
date: 2021-01-26
|
||||
tags:
|
||||
- philosophy
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# Was Social Media a Mistake?
|
||||
|
||||
<big>Subjective Opinions Ahead</big>
|
||||
|
||||
This entire post is a big pile of opinions. Please feel free to skip this one if
|
||||
you don't want to hear it. It says so in the footer of each page, but I want to
|
||||
emphasize that these opinions are my own and not that of my employers (past,
|
||||
current or future). This is my subjective opinion. I cannot be unbiased about
|
||||
this topic (though I also doubt that anyone who has experienced it can be), so
|
||||
instead of trying to pretend to be unbiased in this article I'm just going to
|
||||
let the words out.
|
||||
|
||||
I also don't really have any solution to propose in this article. This is a
|
||||
problem that is way bigger than a single shitposter like me can really handle on
|
||||
their own. I am one person among an unfathomably large crowd. If this makes you
|
||||
think, then I have done my job.
|
||||
|
||||
Buckle up, I'm doing a philosophy.
|
||||
|
||||
> It is difficult
|
||||
> to get the news from poems
|
||||
> yet men die miserably every day
|
||||
> for lack
|
||||
> of what is found there.
|
||||
|
||||
- [Asphodel, That Greeny Flower](https://poets.org/poem/asphodel-greeny-flower-excerpt) (William Carlos Williams)
|
||||
|
||||
Traditionally, getting your message in front of thousands or millions of people
|
||||
required you to be a public figure working for a media company. The idea of a
|
||||
self-service tool for individuals to get a message out to anyone who cared to
|
||||
read it was expensive, and usually limited to small areas due to the expense of
|
||||
mailing things. [In the late
|
||||
1960's](https://www.history.com/news/who-invented-the-internet),
|
||||
[ARPANET](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ARPANET) was created by the US
|
||||
Department of Defense as a project to enable remote access to computers over the
|
||||
existing phone network. Some of the first services that were created are
|
||||
constants even today: remote login, file transfer and email. After a decade of
|
||||
experimentation, the National Science Foundation funded the installation of
|
||||
supercomputers at a few universities and provided connectivity between them.
|
||||
Ordinary people wanted to hook into these supercomputers and the internet as we
|
||||
know it today blossomed forth.
|
||||
|
||||
With this new network it was easier than ever to get your message out to the
|
||||
world, all you needed to do was install expensive hardware, an expensive type of
|
||||
phone line and potentially custom software to serve your message over a protocol
|
||||
such as [Gopher](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gopher_(protocol)). Or, you could
|
||||
just lease space from someone else who had set all this up. During this time
|
||||
everything was a bit experimental. Everything was quirky. Personality and flair
|
||||
oozed from the edges of every handcrafted page you set your eyes on. Of course,
|
||||
making those pages was an art in its own right.
|
||||
|
||||
These bursts of creativity gave people ideas, and as time progressed, companies
|
||||
formed around the idea of making it easier to let people get their message out
|
||||
to the internet via their servers. Geocites, Livejournal, Blogger, Wordpress,
|
||||
Tumblr, Twitter, Facebook, Orkut and others formed to help people communicate.
|
||||
Facebook became larger than most countries. Twitter became the communications
|
||||
media of choice for global superpowers. Wordpress became one of the biggest
|
||||
attack vectors on the internet. Geocites lived, died and was reborn. The
|
||||
survivors were branded "social media". Social media forms the backbone of a lot
|
||||
of our modern culture. You probably got the link to this article from some form
|
||||
of social media.
|
||||
|
||||
> "Glum, Marc, glum" The clap on the shoulder made him start, look up. It was
|
||||
> that brute Henry Foster. "What you need is a gramme of soma. All the
|
||||
> advantages of Christianity and alcohol; none of their defects".
|
||||
|
||||
- Brave New World (Aldous Huxley), Location 672-674
|
||||
|
||||
And through all of it people got their messages out. Entire social movements
|
||||
were formed on the backs of those messages. Without those messages, I probably
|
||||
would not exist in the way that I currently do. Those messages have changed me
|
||||
and likely have changed _countless_ other people too.
|
||||
|
||||
So, now that we have everyone communicating so openly, freely and to mass
|
||||
audiences, what are the societal consequences? A country divided. Left and
|
||||
right, red and blue, messages of love twisted into messages of hate, divisions
|
||||
across cultural and ideological boundaries. Has it all really been worth it? Is
|
||||
the ability to communicate so quickly so far really a net benefit for us all?
|
||||
|
||||
<center>
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
</center>
|
||||
|
||||
- [Duck or Rabbit?](https://www.newyorker.com/cartoon/a18662) - Paul Noth
|
||||
|
||||
Has it really been worth destroying families in its wake?
|
||||
|
||||
What about those with chronic anxiety disorders or other similar things?
|
||||
|
||||
There's a good word for what happens as a result of this:
|
||||
[doomscrolling](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Doomscrolling).
|
||||
|
||||
To put it lightly, 2020 has not been a year with much in the "good news"
|
||||
department. A global pandemic separated people. Conventions were cancelled.
|
||||
Travel became all but impossible. We had the ability and foresight to see it
|
||||
coming but we still fucked it up.
|
||||
|
||||
> come on brain make the happy chemical you lump of fuck
|
||||
|
||||
- [housewive#1](https://twitter.com/heebiejeebis/status/1123236591755874304)
|
||||
|
||||
Sex sells movies, but doom sells newspapers. And on social media, negative
|
||||
articles perform better. Doom makes people afraid. Fear makes people angry.
|
||||
Anger makes people react. Reactions drive engagement. Engagement makes the
|
||||
algorithm put that article in front of more people so it can make the anger
|
||||
happen all over again.
|
||||
|
||||
> Fear is the path to the dark side.<br />
|
||||
> Fear leads to anger.<br />
|
||||
> Anger leads to hate.<br />
|
||||
> Hate leads to suffering.<br />
|
||||
> I sense much fear in you.
|
||||
|
||||
- Yoda, The Phantom Menace
|
||||
|
||||
Is The Algorithm to blame? People talk about The Algorithm like it's some kind
|
||||
of benevolent god that gives them the happy chemical sometimes. How does what
|
||||
The Algorithm optimizes for have effects on society at large? By putting posts
|
||||
that are bound to cause engagement (basically reactions) in front of the largest
|
||||
audience possible, how does this affect people? How does this affect their
|
||||
worldviews? How does this affect how people percieve what is true and what is
|
||||
false?
|
||||
|
||||
One of the biggest hits that social media has done to our world is that it's
|
||||
made truth become a relative thing instead of an objective thing. Take the
|
||||
recent 2020 election for example. There are people who believe that Donald Trump
|
||||
objectively won the election, despite all of the other correlating evidence that
|
||||
leads others to conclude the exact opposite. This seems confusing at first. To
|
||||
become the president you need to win the election. To win the election you need
|
||||
more electoral votes. Joe Biden got more electoral votes, therefore Biden won
|
||||
the election, therefore Joe Biden is the new president of the US.
|
||||
|
||||
But these [alternative facts](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VSrEEDQgFc8)
|
||||
persist. Thanks to idiologies such as QAnon, these views flourish. Thanks to
|
||||
social media, they have places to communicate, re-interpret and plan. Where does
|
||||
the responsibility of individuals end and the responsibility of platforms begin?
|
||||
|
||||
> Each individual must know them self to be free of all forms of external
|
||||
> reliance. This is not to imply that one should not trust others or band
|
||||
> together in alliances of friendship and community. It is simply a warning that
|
||||
> relative truth is constantly shifting in the hands of those who desire to
|
||||
> control, and even though their motives may be of good will, it is still a form
|
||||
> of control.
|
||||
|
||||
- [The Shifting Models of Existence](https://wingmakers.com/writings/philosophy/chambertwo/) (WingMakers)
|
||||
|
||||
Are we really all that different? We're all human. We are all limited. What real
|
||||
benefit do we reap by this separation? What do we gain by letting us get so
|
||||
divided that we can't realistically see the chasm being bridged?
|
||||
|
||||
Can this chasm be bridged?
|
||||
|
||||
What of the ruined lives in the wake?
|
||||
|
||||
Without social media though, my best friends would be unknown to me (if they
|
||||
even ended up existing). My fiance would be a stranger to me. This blog likely
|
||||
wouldn't exist in its current form. I would have never questioned my gender. I
|
||||
would have never done all of the things that have lead me to be the person I am
|
||||
today. I would not have the job I have today. I would not have the career I have
|
||||
today (early in my career, networking over slack and IRC while delivering pizzas
|
||||
is literally how I got my break into the industry). Social media is how I keep
|
||||
in touch with my family. To put it simply, social media's proliferation is a
|
||||
good part of how I managed to become the self-realized nonbinary person I am.
|
||||
Without it existing I would be a vastly different person.
|
||||
|
||||
It makes me wonder how others are affected like I have been. How many would come
|
||||
out as transgender without knowing the concept exists? How many would feel safe
|
||||
to speak out against taboos without spaces to explore what taboos even are?
|
||||
|
||||
Is it the _implementation_ of social media that is flawed or is it the _concept_
|
||||
that is flawed?
|
||||
|
||||
According to [this post by Boston University's College of
|
||||
Communication](https://sites.bu.edu/cmcs/2017/11/16/printing-press-digital-age-and-social-movements/)
|
||||
human communication has had three major phases of development:
|
||||
|
||||
- Oral Tradition
|
||||
- Literacy/Books/Print Media
|
||||
- Electronic Communication/Social Media
|
||||
|
||||
We are just on the cusp of the last phase beginning, from a grander history
|
||||
scale that is. The age of literacy and print media lasted for at least
|
||||
_thousands_ of years. Social media and the interet has existed for 50 years by
|
||||
the most liberal estimates. Maybe this is one of those cases where large changes
|
||||
in these models cause outright societal chaos _because_ it exposes the biases
|
||||
that we've already had for so long. Are things chaotic because of the change or
|
||||
is the change making things chaotic?
|
||||
|
||||
<center>
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
</center>
|
||||
|
||||
Just because we can get Uncle Bob's hot takes on the geopolitical state of
|
||||
affairs between the US and Canada, does that mean we _should_? How do we know
|
||||
what's more accurate: memes shared in parenting groups or news articles behind
|
||||
paywalls? Why is it easier to get junk food than it is to get healthy things?
|
||||
|
||||
This [post on
|
||||
/r/starslatecodex](https://www.reddit.com/r/slatestarcodex/comments/9rvroo/most_of_what_you_read_on_the_internet_is_written/)
|
||||
comes to mind. Its main thesis (that it does an admittedly poor job defending)
|
||||
is that most of what you read on the internet is written by a tiny fraction of
|
||||
people that don't represent the rest very well. If you've run communities in the
|
||||
past I'm sure you are familiar with the power laws at play:
|
||||
|
||||
- 90% of people lurk and contribute only spairingly
|
||||
- 9% of people actively contribute to discussions or create new one
|
||||
- 1% of people seemingly have no other social life outside that community
|
||||
|
||||
Those top 10% of contributors are either somewhat sensible people (in rare
|
||||
cases) or more than likely not representative of rest that just passively lurk.
|
||||
We can see these patterns arise in other places too. Most people that read books
|
||||
consume them without contributing to discussions about them. Even fewer people
|
||||
are authors. Fewer are prolific authors. Politics (via voting rates), recipe
|
||||
groups, even multi-level marketing scams fall into these power rules.
|
||||
|
||||
Is this power rule something that is just natural for humans?
|
||||
|
||||
Was social media a mistake or could it actually end up being a net benefit like
|
||||
the printing press turned out to be? What societal changes will we need to make
|
||||
as a result of everyone being able to contact everyone else with the touch of a
|
||||
button?
|
||||
|
||||
> This discovery of yours will create forgetfulness in the learners’ souls,
|
||||
> because they will not use their memories; they will trust to the external
|
||||
> written characters and not remember of themselves.
|
||||
>
|
||||
> The specific which you have discovered is an aid not to memory, but to
|
||||
> reminiscence, and you give your disciples not truth, but only the semblance of
|
||||
> truth; they will be hearers of many things and will have learned nothing; they
|
||||
> will appear to be omniscient and will generally know nothing; they will be
|
||||
> tiresome company, having the show of wisdom without the reality.
|
||||
|
||||
- Socrates, commenting on writing and literacy
|
||||
|
||||
The printing press changed so much because it made books available to the
|
||||
masses. Before the advent of the printing press, making a book could literally
|
||||
take a trained scribe decades. As such they were so expensive that only the
|
||||
elite could afford them. The printing press made it easy for the masses to be
|
||||
able to have books of their own. Not to mention it also made it easy for authors
|
||||
and writers to create books too. Without a lot of these stories, a good chunk of
|
||||
our culture would not exist. However at the same time because it was so easy to
|
||||
churn out print media (compared to hiring a scribe for years, etc) the printing
|
||||
press had real societal consquences. The renaissance was spread on the back of
|
||||
the printing press. Christianity spread as a result of the printing press making
|
||||
it so easy to print out bibles. Public libraries came into existence, changing
|
||||
how books were used as a fundamental resource.
|
||||
|
||||
Is social media the new printing press? If so, what impact will it end up having
|
||||
on us all?
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
I don't know the answers to a lot of these questions. I don't know if they can
|
||||
be answered today. I don't know if it is possible to answer these questions. But
|
||||
damn if they don't make me think a lot. There is just so much ground to cover
|
||||
when you're talking about something like this that encompasses just about
|
||||
_everything_. These are complicated questions. There are a billion moving parts.
|
||||
|
||||
However, I think that if our society survives long enough to see it, social
|
||||
media will end up becoming central to our lives in ways that we can't even imagine.
|
||||
Loading…
Reference in New Issue